[altq 112] Re: YOD (yet other doubts...)

[Kenjiro Cho <kjc@csl.sony.co.jp>]

Lin Su Mei wrote:
>> I know that. The program should implement like what you said but actually it
>> is not. That is, the
>> program doesn't matches what it said on paper and it doesn't matches the
>> spirits of CBQ
>> =>"in conjection time(when a class becomes regulated) a class will get it's
>> allocated link-sharing
>> bandwidth withouth punishedment from how much it used before. "

The original design of CBQ allows to control the penalty for excess
bandwidth use in the past.
You can set "minidle" to 0 not to punish a class.

From A.1 of the CBQ TON paper:
	The implementation of the estimator should also explicitly
	consider to what extent the limit status of a class should be
	influenced by previous bandwidth the class has received in
	excess of its allocated share.  In our simulator, this is done
	with a parameter that specifies a minimum (negative) value for
	the variable avg. 

-Kenjiro