[altq 1465] Re: Another source of HFSC-ALTQ unfairness

[Kenjiro Cho <kjc@csl.sony.co.jp>]

Oleg Cherevko wrote:
> > What do you think about the following patch for init_v()?
> > (I'll take a closer look tomorrow.)
> 
> [...patch skipped...]
> 
> This patch is along the lines of the second possible solution path
> outlined by me, and as far as I see it should work OK for *linear*
> link-sharing service curves. It is, however, a bit against the "spirit of 
> HFSC" in the sense that it simply drops service curves min operation
> altogether as soon as there are any troubles with aligning those curves
> against single consistent virtual time from one parent backlogged period.

Hmm, the patch doesn't change the logic when the parent backlog period
doesn't change.

-Kenjiro