[altq 362] Re: questions about DS on CBQ

[Kenjiro Cho <kjc@csl.sony.co.jp>]

Antoine Gondel wrote:
> In last release, the proposed cbq configuration for supporting DS is as
> follows:

[snip]

> I have 2 questions:
> - Is there any reason not to set 'borrow' for the ef_class, whereas it
> prevents this class from using unused bandwidth ?

Basically, EF does not allow its bandwidth over-committed so that
borrowing does not happen with EF.

> - What is the interest of gathering all af classes under a single
> def_class instead of putting them on top level with ef_class ?

It is not a requirement but it seems better to separate non-over
committable EF from the rest of other over-commitable classes.

-Kenjiro