[altq 459] Re: Questions about CBQ with RSVP.

[Kenjiro Cho <kjc@csl.sony.co.jp>]

Ping Yuan wrote:
> I am now doing some test on rsvp and cbq. But, I am
> not very sure if it works correctly on my machine. 
> 
> I've generated many sessions, each requesting for a
> certain bandwidth and reserved in FF style. If the
> request admitted, i tried to send flow. But when I
> used cbqstat to see what happened, I found that only
> one leaf classes was added ( class 1 ). Who can tell
> me if that is correct?

[snip]

> Also, using "rstat" I can see this:
> 
> Iface   Session   Sender          Neighbor
>  (no resv) 192.168.10.1/40005
>  (no resv) 192.168.10.1/40006
>  (no resv) 192.168.10.1/40007
>  (no resv) 192.168.10.1/40008
>  (no resv) 192.168.10.1/40009
>  (no resv) 192.168.10.1/40010
>  (no resv) 192.168.10.1/40011
>  (no resv) 192.168.10.1/40012

Doesn't this mean there are path states but no reservation is
established for these sessions?

-Kenjiro