[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[altq 38] Re: altq and low bandwidth link

To: "Roman D. Sinyuk" <roman@titanic.uninet.kiev.ua>
Subject: [altq 38] Re: altq and low bandwidth link
From: Kenjiro Cho <kjc@csl.sony.co.jp>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 18:29:14 +0900
Cc: altq@csl.sony.co.jp
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 15 Jun 1999 23:46:44 +0300." <199906152046.XAA26388@titanic.uninet.kiev.ua>
Reply-To: altq@csl.sony.co.jp
Sender: owner-altq@csl.sony.co.jp


We have been using CBQ over a 128Kbps serial line (RISCom N2 card).
It should work ok over 64Kbps.

Also, you might want to take a look at the userland ppp version of
ALTQ.  This implementation is a bit old, though.

-Kenjiro

"Roman D. Sinyuk" <roman@titanic.uninet.kiev.ua> said:
>> Hi All.
>> Can I use altq for flexible traffic allocation on low bandwidth
>> link (64K). This link uses two agencies.

>> Best regards.
>> --
>> Roman D. Sinyuk
>> roman@univ.kiev.ua

References:
- [altq 37] altq and low bandwidth link
  - From: "Roman D. Sinyuk" <roman@titanic.uninet.kiev.ua>

Prev by Date: [altq 37] altq and low bandwidth link
Next by Date: [altq 39] something I cannot understand.
Prev by thread: [altq 37] altq and low bandwidth link
Next by thread: [altq 39] something I cannot understand.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread