[altq 69] Re: [Q] BufferManagementPolicyInALTQ

["R.Dorr" <guru0109@palgong.kyungpook.ac.kr>]

> >> It means... ALTQ use Common Buffer Pool shared multiple queues(SFQ
> >> defaults queue number 255. right?)
> >> Why implements Common Buffer Pool?
> >> I mean... when q length leaches HWM, why search? Just dropping
> >> Is it any advantage in using common buffer pool?(I mean..
> >> implementation complexity.. or existing kernel backward compatibility
> >> or... ... ??? )
>
> As a sample implementation, WFQ in ALTQ just tries a buffer management
> policy different from CBQ.
>  - WFQ limits the total number of packets
>  - CBQ limits the number of packets per class
> Limiting the number of packets per WFQ queue is also fine.
No.. I mean..
"Is there any advantage in implementing SFQ as common buffer pool?"

For example, existing many implementation use common buffer pool skill or
current FreeBSD network kernel architecture use common buffer pool, ....
etc...etc...

Plz show me example
______________________________________________________

Choi Young Soo
e-m@ail   : mailto:guru0109@palgong.kyungpook.ac.kr
myh0me    : http://palgong.kyungpook.ac.kr/~guru0109
TeNet Lab : http://tenet.kyungpook.ac.kr/~guru0109