[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[altq 754] question on WFQ

To: "'altq@csl.sony.co.jp'" <altq@csl.sony.co.jp>
Subject: [altq 754] question on WFQ
From: Narasimha Swamy <NarasimhaS@netbrahma.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:53:02 +0530
Sender: owner-altq@csl.sony.co.jp

> Hi,
> I was looking into WFQ implementation of ALTQ. Weight to each queue
> serviced by WFQ is taken as % of bandwidth. And quota for each queue is
> calculated using the formula : 512 * weight / 100. 
> Can anybody please explain the idea of taking it % of 512 bytes rather
> than link bandwidth. what is rational for using 512. 
> 
> regards
> swamy.
>

Follow-Ups:
- [altq 756] Re: question on WFQ
  - From: Kenjiro Cho <kjc@csl.sony.co.jp>

Prev by Date: [altq 753] Two queue disciplines for an interface?
Next by Date: [altq 755] Re: Two queue disciplines for an interface?
Prev by thread: [altq 842] unsubscript
Next by thread: [altq 756] Re: question on WFQ
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread