[altq 817] Re: The future of ALTQ, IPsec & IPFILTER playing together ...

[Luigi Rizzo <luigi@info.iet.unipi.it>]

> So, I was going to use ALTQ at the remote site to give priority to 
> outgoing camera control, and audio and to downgrade the outgoing 
> video to the small bandwidth that remains.
...
> I believe that this is a major obstacle right now that will 
> fail my project. Instead I will have to revert back from IPFILTER
> to IPFW (FreeBSD) so that I can use DUMMYNET instead of ALTQ.
> This leaves me with having to add a TOS-based filtering into 
> IPFW. Cross my fingers and it will work :-/

i still fail to see why you hate so much this solution
as it seems to do what you need (actually i'd probably use the WFQ
feature of dummynet, and let the application set the TOS bits...)

	cheers
	luigi

-----------------------------------+-------------------------------------
  Luigi RIZZO, luigi@iet.unipi.it  . Dip. di Ing. dell'Informazione
  http://www.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/  . Universita` di Pisa
  TEL/FAX: +39-050-568.533/522     . via Diotisalvi 2, 56126 PISA (Italy)
  Mobile   +39-347-0373137
-----------------------------------+-------------------------------------